WHY ARE SIGNED COMICS BEING LISTED AS VARIANTS Messages in this topic - RSS

CARTER-COMICS
CARTER-COMICS
Posts: 7

4/1/2023

CARTER-COMICS
CARTER-COMICS
Posts: 7
I do not believe a signed book should be a variant. The cover dictates a variant in most cases. CPG has a location for if your cover is signed...variant or not. (example) -> The Electric Black #1 2nd print in a variant...but now CPG has the same book listed twice...once as 2nd print variant and once as signed variant. If that is the case...I can go get The Amazing Spider-Man #1 variants and have them signed by different people and quadruple the amount of variants...(like we need that...lol)!
+1 link
glorkar
glorkar
Posts: 689

4/1/2023

glorkar
glorkar
Posts: 689
It's not all signed books.
Dynamic Forces sort of gets grandfathered in for some reason.
But I agree, the cover is the cover. Shouldn't matter if a shop (even one as reputable as DF) is certifying a signed copy.
+2 link
cartercontrols
cartercontrols
Posts: 7

4/5/2023

cartercontrols
cartercontrols
Posts: 7
I find the same cover on here twice...one DF version and the same DF version signed...both have different variant issue names. The cover is the cover...signed should not be a different cover variant....signed is denoted in your personal collection. I would like to see a section specifically for COA/who issued/COA number...not a big deal because I use the note section for that, but would be a nice little feature like the signed and by who.
+1 link