Counterfeit X-Men 94
The ComicsPriceGuide.com Boards
Home       Members    Calendar    Who's On
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
        


««12345»»»

Counterfeit X-Men 94 Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted 9/21/2009 8:02:52 PM


Enthusiast

EnthusiastEnthusiastEnthusiastEnthusiastEnthusiastEnthusiastEnthusiastEnthusiastEnthusiastEnthusiast

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 10/30/2009 12:59:46 PM
Posts: 85, Visits: 214
szelim (9/21/2009)





This great auction listing is for a certified copy of X-Men #94 - published by Marvel Comics and dated August 1975 - featuring the beginning of the new X-Men in this title. This issue's cover is by Gil Kane and Dave Cockrum, interior art by Dave Cockrum and Bob McLeod while the story was crafted by Len Wein and Chris Claremont. It has been professionally graded by the Certified Grading Company (CGC) as NG with WHITE pages. This means it was determined to be counterfeit. The condition of the book looks like a 9.4 NM to 9.6 NM+ with beautiful color, luster and overall eye appeal. Can't afford the real deal? Then this one is perfect for you! I am unable to find any census data for this book, however it can be verified as being professionally slabbed by calling CGC. The serial number of this unique book is 0156249001. Sorry, no returns accepted on third party certified items since it has been stated this is not an authentic printing of this book. Please see pictures of the actual item offered.


And the picture he posted was of the copy people were getting with "counterfeit" written all over it.

Anyone who bought this knew exactly what they were getting and the buyer will likely list it unslabbed months from now. End of story. Which is what the real concern is - and I'm not as interested in the back story as I am how this was "faked". I'd like to be able to spot new techniques in replication, although that's not usually a problem since it ain't easy to fake dirt and most of my genuinely expensive back issues are diiiiirty.


Post #73038
Posted 9/21/2009 8:17:33 PM


Master Collector

Master CollectorMaster CollectorMaster CollectorMaster CollectorMaster CollectorMaster CollectorMaster CollectorMaster CollectorMaster CollectorMaster Collector

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 12:08:08 AM
Posts: 1,642, Visits: 2,958
"NG"? Goofballs, not that hard to give it a proper grade.
Post #73040
Posted 9/21/2009 8:21:07 PM


Administrator...You betcha, by golly!

Administrator...You betcha, by golly!Administrator...You betcha, by golly!Administrator...You betcha, by golly!Administrator...You betcha, by golly!Administrator...You betcha, by golly!Administrator...You betcha, by golly!Administrator...You betcha, by golly!Administrator...You betcha, by golly!Administrator...You betcha, by golly!Administrator...You betcha, by golly!

Group: Administrators
Last Login: Yesterday @ 7:38:35 PM
Posts: 2,712, Visits: 7,820
Hmmm...Issue #94 was before the Baxter paper...so "White pages" may be the major clue here...

Maybe the interior isn't newsprint like it should have been...maybe it's just white copy paper...

Which would make counterfeiting as easy as running an exploded copy through your HP all-in-one...just hit the duplex button and you've got printing on both sides...just all on modern paper...

Back in the 1970s it wasn't unusual to find a coverless key married to a "color-xeroxed" cover...almost always with a blank interior cover...in fact...somewhere around here I've got a Flash #105 like that...

But I have to say back then 90% of the people selling would tell you right up front...

--Shadow
CPG Administrator (since 2003)

10,962 posts BC. (Before Change)
Dedicated to the memory of Bill Johnson (wrjwrj)....comics were his friends...

Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men?...The Shadow knows!
_______________________________________
Opinions and observations by any administrator
may not reflect the views of ComicsPriceGuide.com, its staff or ownership.
If you have any questions about this CPG Admin post, please email
bryan@comicspriceguide.com.

Post #73041
Posted 9/21/2009 9:05:00 PM


Enthusiast

EnthusiastEnthusiastEnthusiastEnthusiastEnthusiastEnthusiastEnthusiastEnthusiastEnthusiastEnthusiast

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 10/30/2009 12:59:46 PM
Posts: 85, Visits: 214
I kinda disagree with giving it a grade.

"Well, we've reviewed your replica cover filled with Business Depot recycled photocopy paper sir, and I'd say it's in 9.4 condition."

Sounds silly doesn't it?


Post #73044
Posted 9/21/2009 9:20:08 PM


Forum Legend

Forum LegendForum LegendForum LegendForum LegendForum LegendForum LegendForum LegendForum LegendForum LegendForum Legend

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 6:51:06 PM
Posts: 6,654, Visits: 5,462
Shadow (9/21/2009)
Hmmm...Issue #94 was before the Baxter paper...so "White pages" may be the major clue here...

Maybe the interior isn't newsprint like it should have been...maybe it's just white copy paper...

Which would make counterfeiting as easy as running an exploded copy through your HP all-in-one...just hit the duplex button and you've got printing on both sides...just all on modern paper...

Back in the 1970s it wasn't unusual to find a coverless key married to a "color-xeroxed" cover...almost always with a blank interior cover...in fact...somewhere around here I've got a Flash #105 like that...

But I have to say back then 90% of the people selling would tell you right up front...


Shadow,

Didn't you and I discuss a Green Lantern #1 (vol 1) that was an exact replica of this fashion? I think it was you who gave me the advice to pass on buying it. It was created in the 1970's too.

TEX


Big List of Tex's GUNS


MM
"Come. Fly with Me."

Post #73046
Posted 9/21/2009 9:26:18 PM


Administrator...You betcha, by golly!

Administrator...You betcha, by golly!Administrator...You betcha, by golly!Administrator...You betcha, by golly!Administrator...You betcha, by golly!Administrator...You betcha, by golly!Administrator...You betcha, by golly!Administrator...You betcha, by golly!Administrator...You betcha, by golly!Administrator...You betcha, by golly!Administrator...You betcha, by golly!

Group: Administrators
Last Login: Yesterday @ 7:38:35 PM
Posts: 2,712, Visits: 7,820
texranger37 (9/21/2009)
Shadow (9/21/2009)
Hmmm...Issue #94 was before the Baxter paper...so "White pages" may be the major clue here...

Maybe the interior isn't newsprint like it should have been...maybe it's just white copy paper...

Which would make counterfeiting as easy as running an exploded copy through your HP all-in-one...just hit the duplex button and you've got printing on both sides...just all on modern paper...

Back in the 1970s it wasn't unusual to find a coverless key married to a "color-xeroxed" cover...almost always with a blank interior cover...in fact...somewhere around here I've got a Flash #105 like that...

But I have to say back then 90% of the people selling would tell you right up front...


Shadow,

Didn't you and I discuss a Green Lantern #1 (vol 1) that was an exact replica of this fashion? I think it was you who gave me the advice to pass on buying it. It was created in the 1970's too.

TEX

Hmmmm   ....

I don't recall giving such sage advice...but I'll be happy to take credit for it if no body else does...

--Shadow
CPG Administrator (since 2003)

10,962 posts BC. (Before Change)
Dedicated to the memory of Bill Johnson (wrjwrj)....comics were his friends...

Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men?...The Shadow knows!
_______________________________________
Opinions and observations by any administrator
may not reflect the views of ComicsPriceGuide.com, its staff or ownership.
If you have any questions about this CPG Admin post, please email
bryan@comicspriceguide.com.

Post #73047
Posted 9/22/2009 12:58:12 AM


Collector

CollectorCollectorCollectorCollectorCollectorCollectorCollectorCollectorCollectorCollector

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 10/7/2009 10:58:50 PM
Posts: 125, Visits: 745
Silver Age Surfer (9/21/2009)
I kinda disagree with giving it a grade.

"Well, we've reviewed your replica cover filled with Business Depot recycled photocopy paper sir, and I'd say it's in 9.4 condition."

Sounds silly doesn't it?

CGC had in the past graded books with a qualified grade and a note identifying reproduced pages (e.g., see below).  CGC had done so for a short while (about 10 such books were graded this way) before they changed their policy to assigning either a NG or 0.5, depending on the book submitted. 

CGC apparently does not consider fully repro'd pages to actually be part of the book.

Post #73064
Posted 9/22/2009 1:00:10 AM
Senior Collector

Senior CollectorSenior CollectorSenior CollectorSenior CollectorSenior CollectorSenior CollectorSenior CollectorSenior CollectorSenior CollectorSenior Collector

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 7:50:15 PM
Posts: 561, Visits: 678
Silver Age Surfer (9/21/2009)
I kinda disagree with giving it a grade.

"Well, we've reviewed your replica cover filled with Business Depot recycled photocopy paper sir, and I'd say it's in 9.4 condition."

Sounds silly doesn't it?


No, because there are collectors that collect counterfeit books for the historical placemarks or impression they left on the hobby. If it's a well done counterfeit, I want to know. They should grade it and quit acting like they are my protector. It's fine that they labeled it as counterfeit a dozen times. To me, 'not' grading it shows bias against people collecting it and partiality towards people who don't want it to exist. Evidently it does exist. They should do the damn job they are being paid to do instead of trying to steer me into collecting what they want me to collect.
Post #73065
Posted 9/22/2009 1:07:47 AM
Senior Collector

Senior CollectorSenior CollectorSenior CollectorSenior CollectorSenior CollectorSenior CollectorSenior CollectorSenior CollectorSenior CollectorSenior Collector

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 7:50:15 PM
Posts: 561, Visits: 678
CGC apparently does not consider fully repro'd pages to actually be part of the book.


Nor would I if that's in fact what this is. Grade it accordingly with a PLOD (or whatever they do to clarify it's incomplete) and move to the next book. It's possible that someone could do high quality scans and use a print-on-demand service to make a nice counterfeit. If so, it'd be nice to know.

Currently I know a group of some collectors that are wanting to produce a high quality treasury sized version of a comic they liked and distribute it amongst themselves. I suspect they'll get the copyright holder's approval, but either way, it's still collectible just like bootleg or pirated music.
Post #73066
Posted 9/22/2009 3:57:13 PM


Forum Legend

Forum LegendForum LegendForum LegendForum LegendForum LegendForum LegendForum LegendForum LegendForum LegendForum Legend

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 6:51:06 PM
Posts: 6,654, Visits: 5,462
Aphelion (9/22/2009)
Silver Age Surfer (9/21/2009)
I kinda disagree with giving it a grade.

"Well, we've reviewed your replica cover filled with Business Depot recycled photocopy paper sir, and I'd say it's in 9.4 condition."

Sounds silly doesn't it?


No, because there are collectors that collect counterfeit books for the historical placemarks or impression they left on the hobby. If it's a well done counterfeit, I want to know. They should grade it and quit acting like they are my protector. It's fine that they labeled it as counterfeit a dozen times. To me, 'not' grading it shows bias against people collecting it and partiality towards people who don't want it to exist. Evidently it does exist. They should do the damn job they are being paid to do instead of trying to steer me into collecting what they want me to collect.


WOW,

What a great discussion!

1. Hey Aphelion! How are you?

For Aphelion: Do you think that grading counterfeit books might break some preexisting relationship between comics publishers and the CGC? Do you think that grading counterfeit comics would in some way "tarnish their reputation" for being the best at authentication?

2. Hey S.A.S.! How are you?

For S.A.S. : Why do you think that it is the business of the CGC (or in their best interests) not to grade counterfeit items? Should they not just be a neutral grading company?

I'd love to read your thoughts.

TEX

TEX


Big List of Tex's GUNS


MM
"Come. Fly with Me."

Post #73102
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

««12345»»»

Reading This Topic Expand / Collapse
Active Users: 0 (0 guests, 0 members, 0 anonymous members)
No members currently viewing this topic.
Forum Moderators: bneely, Rocket2600, Shadow, argus, ckillian, Set 0ne, WOLFEN, Speedy-D, Earl Davis, coffeeman27, Yogurt, Brock, DoctrMidNite, mballard

Permissions Expand / Collapse

All times are GMT -5:00, Time now is 1:13am

Powered By InstantForum.NET v4.1.4 © 2010
Execution: 0.266. 9 queries. Compression Disabled.