|
|
|
Master Collector
        
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 11/5/2008 2:41:03 PM
Posts: 675,
Visits: 2,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
Newbie
        
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 11/5/2008 4:54:37 PM
Posts: 4,
Visits: 14
|
|
| thanks... 
|
|
|
|
|
Master Collector
        
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 10:08:35 PM
Posts: 835,
Visits: 2,024
|
|
| Much better. Look like about a 6.0 - 6.5.
|
|
|
|
|
Master Collector
        
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 10:08:35 PM
Posts: 835,
Visits: 2,024
|
|
| Another Spiderman with no major flaws. Once again tanning the big issue here. 

|
|
|
|
|
A True Collector
        
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 10/28/2008 11:42:41 PM
Posts: 1,923,
Visits: 2,491
|
|
| 5.0? don't know what to give it. the tanning makes it hard.
|
|
|
|
|
Master Collector
        
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 11/5/2008 2:41:03 PM
Posts: 675,
Visits: 2,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
Master Collector
        
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 10:08:35 PM
Posts: 835,
Visits: 2,024
|
|
batfan (5/21/2008) 5.0? don't know what to give it. the tanning makes it hard.Tanning drives me crazy too. I want to ignore it but don't know at what level it stops effecting the grade.
|
|
|
|
|
Master Collector
        
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 10:08:35 PM
Posts: 835,
Visits: 2,024
|
|
Speedy-D (5/21/2008) I was thinking around 6.0. I ran it through E-BIGS and with the tanning they gave it a 5.0 which seems harsh to me.When I changed the cover whiteness from cream to tan it goes from a 9.0 to a 5.5  I think it's somewhere in between, tanning aside I think an argument could be made for a 7.0 on his one. I'm leaning towards a 6.0 - 6.5 with the tanning.
|
|
| |