“I don’t do this for the Commander in Chief.  I do this for my country, and I will continue to do so.”

"They are blind to history's clear lesson, for history teaches with unmistakable emphasis that appeasement but begets new and bloodier war. It points to no single instance where this end has justified that means, where appeasement has led to more than a sham peace. Like blackmail, it lays the basis for new and successively greater demands until, as in blackmail, violence becomes the only other alternative."

"Why," my soldiers asked of me, "surrender military advantages to an enemy in the field?" I could not answer.

- Gen Douglas MacArthur

Captain America stood for Truth and Justice above all else.  I think you are correct in that initialy he would have followed orders, but those orders stopped being the governments and became Tony Starks as Civil War progressed which makes me believe that Cap saw the problem, and did what he felt was best for the country.  In other words, going against the very governement he defended for so long.  I agree with you that Cap was likely a skrull, however I think the real cap would have done te same thing.

Now for the interesting question....  assuming cap was a skrull, and the real cap finally shows back up.  Anyone want to take a guess as to how Marvel will handle the first meeting between the real Cap and the winter solider?  As far as the real cap would know Bucky would still have been dead, and assuming the real cap appears now, then he would have missed out on the entire Winter Solider is evil story and would just see Bucky, and not a solider he's been battling with these past few years (our time).

Gilight (5/15/2008)

---

then what was series "Chosen" about ? If that was a skrull with mind powers im gonna be aggrivated.....

I think that took place in some other Marvel dimension.

--------------------------------------------

“I don’t do this for the Commander in Chief.  I do this for my country, and I will continue to do so.”

"They are blind to history's clear lesson, for history teaches with unmistakable emphasis that appeasement but begets new and bloodier war. It points to no single instance where this end has justified that means, where appeasement has led to more than a sham peace. Like blackmail, it lays the basis for new and successively greater demands until, as in blackmail, violence becomes the only other alternative."

"Why," my soldiers asked of me, "surrender military advantages to an enemy in the field?" I could not answer.

- Gen Douglas MacArthur